Instead of jumping straight into revisions, D:bo helped us clarify the criteria first. The scope of changes became much more stable.
Product Designer
B2B SaaS Team
For design operations
Stay focused on design.
Let 
structure the rest.
Turn vague feedback, scattered context, and ambiguous requests into structured decisions.
D:bo helps design teams move from criteria to execution with shared context.
D:bo organizes
Feedback→
Criteria→
Execution Cards→
Team Alignment
D:bo agent brief
Turn feedback into criteria, decisions, and executable work.
CriteriaCore JudgmentExecution Card
input
Leadership says the screen should feel more intuitive, but the team is not sure where the revision should begin.
Separate problem feedback from preference comments
Separate full redesign needs from focused fixes
Create a decision statement for the engineering team
core judgment
Before changing the visuals, identify which elements are blocking user understanding.
Work Type
Feedback Triage
Priority
Problem vs Preference
Stakeholders
Lead · Engineering
product flow
Not another feature tour.
See design decisions take shape.
See how D:bo turns messy design context into decision cards, execution flows, and shared team understanding.
dibo.so / decision workspace
why D:bo
Designers get stuck
before the screen work begins.
Requests like “make it more intuitive,” “share this by Friday,” or “make it clear for engineering” carry hidden decisions. Execution stays aligned when those criteria are made explicit.
Feedback
When problem feedback and preference comments are mixed, revision scope keeps shifting.
Screen Revision
Teams need criteria to decide whether to inspect CTAs, hierarchy, or UX writing first.
Team Alignment
PMs, leads, and engineers need decision sentences they can understand quickly.
Decision Records
When the rationale remains, the next decision becomes faster and clearer.
why use D:bo
Reduce the hidden work
around design.
Instead of adding another to-do layer, D:bo reduces the repeated decision-making, sharing, and documentation work that keeps designers away from design.
feedback
Feedback becomes clearer.
Before D:bo
Ambiguous comments like make it more intuitive make it hard to know where revision should begin.
What D:bo handles
D:bo separates product issues from preference comments and defines the criteria to review first.
handoff
Handoff takes less effort.
Before D:bo
Teams rewrite the same background and rationale before meetings, Slack updates, and engineering handoffs.
What D:bo handles
D:bo turns rationale into concise decision notes that PMs, leads, and engineers can understand quickly.
memory
Rationale stays visible.
Before D:bo
A few days later, teams often have to search for why a revision happened.
What D:bo handles
Briefs, execution cards, and retrospectives become reusable context for the next decision.
Revision Starting Point
Know what to inspect first
Team Alignment
Share rationale in a clear sentence
Next Decision
Use past context in the next brief
designer feedback
Why design teams use D:bo
When criteria, shared context, and execution cards are clearly separated, designers can get back to design with less friction.
agent loop
D:bo begins with
decision criteria.
D:bo reads the context behind the work and clarifies the criteria teams need before execution.
01
Start with an unstructured design request
Add raw inputs such as feedback, meeting notes, or open-ended design questions.
02
Clarify work type and decision criteria
D:bo identifies the work type, stakeholders, and risks, then helps the team confirm the criteria.
03
Generate the core decision brief
The brief captures what to decide first, what matters most, and which risks need attention.
04
Connect execution cards and decision records
Move only the necessary cards into execution, then keep outcomes and retrospectives as context for the next decision.
what D:bo does
From criteria to execution
and learning, in one loop.
brief
Decision Brief
Read work type, goals, stakeholders, and risks to define the criteria that matter now.
decision
What to Decide First
Separate tasks from decisions and surface the questions that could derail execution.
execution
Execution Cards
Turn decisions into task, decision, and sharing cards, then move only what is needed.
record
Decision Memory
Keep reports and retrospectives so future work can reference previous decisions.
memory
Turn records into
reusable context.
Completed briefs become more than final output. They preserve what worked, what delayed execution, and what alignment was needed so future decisions can build on that context.
Retrospective Needed2026.06.03 ~ 2026.06.07
Landing Hero Revision Decision
core decision
Clarify the value order users need before they click the CTA.
Criteria
User clarity · Fast validation · Engineering alignment
Outcome
5 execution cards · 3 board items · 1 report
trusted by leading teams
faq
Where D:bo fits
into design work.
D:bo is a Design Decision Agent for design teams. It turns vague feedback, meeting notes, and work requests into decision briefs and execution cards so teams can move with shared context.
A typical to-do app records tasks. D:bo structures the criteria, alignment questions, execution cards, and retrospective context behind the work.
A Design Decision Agent structures the criteria and context designers need before execution. D:bo connects that process across briefs, execution boards, reports, and retrospectives.
D:bo is built for product designers, UX designers, and design leads who regularly interpret feedback, prepare design reviews, align with engineering teams, and keep decision records.
Stay focused on design.
Let D:bo structure the rest.
Turn today's ambiguous feedback and scattered context into clear criteria, decision briefs, and execution cards.